Gulbarg not a criminal conspiracy? Call records narrate a different story

Naroda Patiya and Gulbarg Society, two places in Ahmedabad where the most dastardly massacres took place on 28th February, 2002, are just 4 kilometers apart. Yet, the judgments that have been pronounced in these two cases are many a miles apart. 14 long years after the mob attack on Gulbarg Society, the trial court yesterday announced its ruling on the Gulbarg massacre where 69 people were mercilessly murdered. The special trial court judge PB Desai convicted 24 persons while acquitting 36 accused. Many a big names were among those who were acquitted. At the same time, the special trial court also dropped the conspiracy charge on the pretext of ‘lack of evidence’. While pawns are often sacrificed at the altar of justice, the suggestion that the assembly of pawns acted on their own volition without a guiding strategy is difficult to digest.

Four years ago, on 29th August 2012, Special judge Jyotsana Yagnik gave out the historic judgment in the Naroda Patiya massacre where she held 32 people responsible for the horrific deaths of 97 people including men, women, children. Among the 32 was former Gujarat Minister Mayaben Kodnani (A-37) who was convicted of the offense under section 302 read with section 120-B of I.P.C. where in Section 120-B deals with criminal conspiracy. The special judge made the following observations to justify the punishment of life imprisonment to Maya Kodnani.

A-37 has been proved to be the kingpin of the entire communal riot and one of the principal conspirators who has actively instigated the rioters and has abetted them to form unlawful assembly to execute the conspiracy hatched under her leadership with other co-conspirators.

The other important conviction in this case was that of Babu Bajrangi (A-18) who was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for remaining period of his natural life. The special judge made the following observations in the case of Babu Bajrangi.

A-18 is one of the principal conspirators, active overt actor of the communal riot on that day, leader and instigator for he co-accused as far as Naroda massacre is concerned. Over and above this, he was also an active member of the unlawful assembly in atleast two of the occurrences including the ghastly evening occurrence.

Thus a clear case of criminal conspiracy was made out in case of Naroda Patiya and the kingpins were identified along with the foot soldiers. However, for a similar case that happened just 4 kms away in Gulbarg society, the only prominent conviction is that of Dr. Atul Vaidya and it was pronounced that there was no criminal conspiracy. Are these two cases totally unrelated? Were BJP/VHP/Bajrang Dal leaders involved in rioting in neighbouring areas acting independently? The phone calls between Dr Atul Vaidya and Babu Bajrangi narrate a different story. Let’s look at the call records between Atul Vaidya (9825289048) and Babu Bajrangi (9825020333) from 27th February, 2002, to 1st March, 2002. 27th February is when the S6 coach in Godhra was burned down causing the unfortunate death of 59 people and 27th to 1st March was the main period in which most of the rioting happened.

Mobile numberTimeDateDialed/received noDialed/received name
982502033310:42:532/27/20029825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033311:35:052/28/20029825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033313:04:212/28/20029825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033309:09:413/01/200209825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033314:53:183/01/200209825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033315:21:553/01/200209825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033317:00:143/01/2002919825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033312:44:003/02/200209825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033308:51:163/03/200209825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033309:23:293/03/200200919825289048Atul Vaidya
982502033319:29:563/03/200200919825289048Atul Vaidya

It can be clearly seen that one of the prime accused of Naroda Patiya, Babu Bajrangi and Atul Vaidya, who is the most prominent conviction in Gulbarg case, have been constantly in touch starting from 27th February to 1st March. Now it must be recalled that the original bandh call on 27th February was given by VHP and was ably supported by Bajrang Dal. Thus, one is forced to wonder as to what was the purpose of calls between Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi and VHP Leader Atul Vaidya, both of whom have now been convicted for cases of rioting, just 4 kms apart.

And the conspirators talking to each other was not limited to Babu Bajrangi and Atul Vaidya. Jaideep Patel, who was the General Secretary of VHP, was also in touch with Babu Bajrangi and Atul Vaidya. Jaideep Patel is also the main accused in the Naroda Gam case where 11 people were killed. Here are the phone call records of Jaideep Patel (9825023887) with Babu Bajrangi (9825020333) and Atul Vaidya (9825289048 ).

Mobile noTimeDateDial/recd noDialed/ received name
982502388711:05:392/28/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388712:57:192/28/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388713:17:042/28/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388709:02:153/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388709:04:593/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388712:15:363/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388714:48:143/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388720:07:503/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388720:10:423/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388720:22:193/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388721:17:113/1/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388710:00:173/2/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388711:35:413/2/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388712:02:263/2/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388708:41:463/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388708:43:183/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388716:52:323/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388720:31:493/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388721:51:033/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388721:54:193/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388722:12:533/3/20029825020333BABU BAJRANGI
982502388712:41:533/1/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA
982502388712:44:453/1/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA
982502388713:07:553/1/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA
982502388716:01:223/1/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA
982502388716:22:003/1/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA
982502388713:01:053/3/20029825289048ATUL VAIDYA

With all the kingpins of different cases speaking to each other from 27th February to 1st March, it can be clearly seen that besides each one of these individual cases being criminal conspiracies, all the events starting 28th February were part of a larger conspiracy hatched by leaders from BJP, VHP and Bajrang Dal. Jaideep Patel, in-fact was the one who had brought and paraded the dead bodies from Godhra in Ahmedabad which led to the riots, And who gave the permission to Jaideep Patel to bring the dead bodies to Ahmedabad? According to then commissioner PC Pande’s deposition in Nanavati Commission, the “Decision to bring Godhra victims’ bodies taken at top level”.

No conspiracy? Yea, right.

Follow the author here:

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Gulbarg not a criminal conspiracy? Call records narrate a different story"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
G Radhakrishnan, Trivandrum
Guest
G Radhakrishnan, Trivandrum
I had almost forgotten about ‘Truth of Gujarat’ – so rarely seen these days. Welcome back! Even Truth of Gujarat fails to realise the changing times that caused the changing judgments in the Naroda Patiya and Gulbarg Society massacre cases. The judgment in the Naroda Patiya case, sentencing a Gujarat minister for life imprisonment for 28 years and upholding conspiracy charge, was delivered in 2012. And the Gulbarg Society massacre case judgment, no conspiracy, politician and police officer acquitted, in 2016. That made the difference. Judges too are normal human beings and have to safeguard their career and family life.… Read more »
kk singh
Guest

Well brought out the facts! And the top level is enjoying the fruits of riots!

wpDiscuz